Just as the nation and Democrats have looked to states like Massachusetts who have pioneered universal health coverage for almost all citizens,
"This year’s state budget is out of balance by $295 million, partly because of rising health costs, meaning more cuts may lie ahead. Insurance premiums continue to grow far faster than inflation. State regulators are thinking about exempting more people from the insurance mandate because they cannot afford to buy policies." (Kevin Sack, The New York Times Online, 3/26/10).
"....health insurers are seeking approval of increases from 7 percent to 34 percent." (Kevin Sack, The New York Times Online, 3/26/10).
How does the Federal government differ? Are they exempt from deficit pressures in an impossible economy?
What if the federal government reimbursed/rewarded states with subsidies if they are able to provide good coverage to residents? State control. State autonomy.
No comments:
Post a Comment